UWA Logo
  Prospective Students | Current Students | Staff | Alumni | Visitors | About    
           
Home
FAQ FAQ FAQ

FAQ

This page addresses some of the more commonly encountered misconceptions about tea tree oil. The list is by no means exhaustive and please contact us if you have a query that is not covered here.
Myths are broadly grouped into the two following categories:

1. Medicinal use and safety of tea tree oil

2. Chemical composition, source and naming of tea tree oil


1. Medicinal use and safety of tea tree oil

Myth: Cineole is a skin irritant

1,8-cineole is also known as eucalyptol since it is the major component of some Eucalyptus essential oils. Several scientific publications have shown that it is not a skin irritant.

Myth: TTO works better in the presence of blood and pus

Many antimicrobial agents work less effectively in the presence of blood and pus or other organic matter. So the suggestion that the activity of tea tree oil will actually increase is appealing. However laboratory work has shown that the activity of tea tree oil is either unaffected or may be reduced by the presence of some organic matter. It is not improved.

Myth: TTO is completely safe because its natural

Nothing is completely safe and this includes TTO. TTO is poisonous if ingested and should only be used topically. A small number of people are allergic to the oil and will experience a skin reaction even at low concentrations. Others may experience an irritant reaction if they use the oil at high concentrations. Irritant reactions usually subside if more dilute oil is used.

Myth: TTO can be taken orally

TTO is toxic if ingested in large enough quantities. Apart from data gleaned from the few cases of poisoning that have been reported in the medical and scientific literature, there are no oral toxicity data for TTO and humans so we do not know if, or how much TTO can be ingested safely. In the absence of data clearly showing that something is safe to ingest, the convention in medicine is to recommend that it not be ingested. Since there are no such data for TTO it cannot be recommended. The TTO contained in oral products such as toothpastes and mouthwashes is not considered problematic since it is expelled from the mouth and not swallowed.

Special consideration needs to be given to the use of TTO during pregnancy and breast-feeding. There are no data showing that topical application of TTO is safe during these times and as above, in the absence of data showing that something is safe to use, it is generally not recommended.

Myth: TTO can cross-sensitise to or cross-react with colophony (colophonium)

Colophony is one of the compounds in a standard dermatology patch test. In some reports of allergy to TTO, patients have also reacted to colophony. This does not prove that TTO sensitised them to colophony or that colophony cross reacts with TTO.

Myth: If TTO inhibits or kills an organism in the lab, it will be effective in the body

Activity in the lab does not always translate to effectiveness in the body. The best way to determine if a treatment is effective in the body is to test it in a randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical trial.

Myth: TTO can cure MRSA infections

MRSA are Staphylococcus aureus bacteria that have become resistant to several antibiotics including methicillin. MRSA can infect people and cause disease, or can simply colonise the skin of healthy people without doing them any harm. MRSA infections are often serious and life-threatening while MRSA colonisation is not usually a problem for the carrier. However, if the MRSA carrier happens to pass their MRSA to a person who is already unwell or who has a wound, they may become very ill.  In hospitals and other healthcare settings, much effort goes into reducing MRSA carriage by decolonising carriers in order to reduce subsequent MRSA infections. Decolonisation plays an important role in infection control.

We know that TTO can inhibit and kill MRSA in the lab. There is also mounting evidence that it may be useful for eliminating the topical carriage of MRSA. On the current evidence, it is unlikely that TTO will be used to treat systemic MRSA infections although it may find a use in treating wounds infected or colonised with MRSA.

Myth: TTO is so effective it may completely replace antibiotics

TTO has antimicrobial properties which may make it suitable for the treatment of some topical infections. However, it is toxic if ingested and can only be used topically. It will never replace antibiotics that are used systemically. In fact, making direct comparisons between TTO and such antibiotics is not appropriate.

Myth: TTO is one of the most powerful antiseptics

There are many antiseptics and disinfectants that have greater antimicrobial activity than TTO, however, none of them are natural. Also, it is unlikely that any of them have the same unique range of properties that TTO has such as antimicrobial activity, anti-inflammatory activity and putative skin penetrating capacity.

Myth: TTO will be registered as a medicine

When medicines are registered with regulatory authorities such as the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration or the US Food and Drug Administration, they are registered as treatments for specific conditions. Each registration requires relevant clinical data and covers only that use. There is no general registration to cover all applications and since there is no such category, TTO can't be registered in it. However, when there are suffcient data, TTO will be registered as a treatment for specific conditions. For example, as a treatment for cold sores, as a treatment for impetigo or as an agent to decolonise MRSA carriers.

2. Chemical composition, source and naming of tea tree oil

Myth: Chinese tea oil is the same as "tea tree oil" (from Melaleuca spp.) 

Chinese tea oil is derived from the seeds of Camellia oleifera. It is used extensively in China as an edible cooking oil and contains 80-90% oleic acid.

Myth: There are lots of “tea tree” oils and they all have medicinal properties

There are lots of plants known as “tea trees” including plants in the Melaleuca and Leptospermum genera. However, tea tree oil (TTO) can only be produced from a very small number of plants, mainly Melaleuca alternifolia. These other oils may have medicinal properties such as antimicrobial activity but few have been scientifically investigated as much as TTO.

Myth: Oil from any Melaleuca or Leptospermum plant can be called TTO

Many plants are commonly called “tea trees” including plants in the Melaleuca and Leptospermum genera. Oils from only a few of them can be called TTO and must meet the requirements of the international standard for TTO. Most TTO is produced from Melaleuca alternifolia.

Myth: “Ti-tree” is another name for tea tree 

Ti-tree is the common name for plants in the Cordyline genus. These are found in New Zealand and the South Pacific.

Myth: TTO must be sourced from Melaleuca alternifolia

The international standard for TTO does not specify which species of Melaleuca must be used to produce the oil. It does however, provide compositional limits for 14 of the more than 100 components that make up TTO. Most TTO is produced from Melaleuca alternifolia grown on plantations but other plants that may produce suitable oils include M. dissitiflora and M. linariifolia.

Myth: Tea trees (Melaleuca alternifolia) grow only in Australia

The native habitat of Melaleuca alternifolia is a small area of north-eastern New South Wales, Australia. However, Melaleuca alternifolia has been cultivated successfully in other parts of New South Wales, in other states of Australia such as Queensland and Western Australia and in other countries.

Myth: “New Zealand tea tree oil” is the same as TTO

The essential oils distilled from Kunzea ericoides and Leptospermum scoparium, also known as kanuka and manuka oils respectively, are often referred to as New Zealand tea tree oils.  They are very different in composition from TTO and it cannot be assumed that they have the same medicinal properties as those shown for TTO.

Myth: TTO is made up of 48 components

TTO is made up of over 100 components. Most have been identified.

Myth: TTO is like turpentine

TTO is composed of compounds known as terpenes. Terpenes are molecules made up of carbon and hydrogen in the ratio C10H16. Other examples of terpenes include: turpentine, B-carotene (carrots) and lycopene (apples and tomatoes).

Myth: There are superior grades of TTO

Although claims are made for superior grades of TTO such as “medicinal”, "pharmaceutical" or “premium” grade, there is no scientific evidence that these oils are better. To date, all TTO that meets the international standard appears to have similar antimicrobial activity.

Myth: Terpinen-4-ol levels should be maximised and 1,8-cineole levels should be minimised

Terpinen-4-ol is the main antimicrobial component of TTO. Levels of terpinen-4-ol in TTO are inversely proportional to levels of 1,8-cineole. i.e. if terpinen-4-ol levels are high then 1,8-cineole levels are low. Terpinen-4-ol is the main antimicrobial component of TTO and to a limited extent, higher levels will correspond to higher activity. However, increasing the levels of terpinen-4-ol above 40% is unlikely to offer any additional benefit compared to oil that just meets the international standard.

Top of Page